Phony Toys, Real Injuries

David Haislip • December 2, 2020

Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, or another such festive day, the holiday season is a time meant to be spent with family, spreading good cheer, stuffing one’s face on a delicious assortment of holiday grub, and exchanging presents so that we may see the joy and wonder of the season on the faces of our children as they open their gifts. Unfortunately though, with the exchanging of gifts comes the worry that these toys are, in fact, safe for our children to play with.

 

With the 2020 Holiday Season upon us, it is the perfect time to educate oneself on a troubling Christmas trend – the rise of counterfeit or “knock-off” children’s toys. 

 

In an interview with New Jersey Radio 101.5, Port Director for the Port of New York and New Jersey with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Adele Fasano, said that in fiscal year 2018 there had been more than 2,900 seizures of counterfeit merchandise, including knock-off children’s toys from overseas.

 

Director Fasano further explained that knowingly buying counterfeit merchandise is illegal in many states – a consequence for the buyer – but that it can also have unintended consequences for others. For one thing, Fasano informed, the proliferation of cheap knock-off merchandise can cannibalize the legitimate market, resulting in  “the loss of American jobs, [and the] support of criminal activity.” Additionally though, Fasano warns that the purchase of such counterfeit merchandise, especially children’s toys, can pose, “significant risks to consumer health and safety.” Therefore, Fasano urged, that when doing your holiday shopping and when picking out toys to buy your children or the children of others, to “please make sure you purchase all your products from reputable sources.”

 

The Lento Law Group reminds that ensuring that the holiday toys you purchase for your children – or for other people’s children – are not counterfeit is particularly important so as to safeguard these children from the risk of potential injury due to cheaply made knock-off toys which may be prone to causing injuries such as lacerations, burns, bruising, choking hazards, or even death.

 

But even legitimate sources toys can pose their hazards as well. 

 

World Against Toys Causing Harm – or W.A.T.C.H. – is a non-profit watch-dog organization dedicated to educating the public about dangerous children’s toys. Every year, W.A.T.C.H. releases an annual “10 Worst Toys” report, informing parents of what the organization considers to be that year’s top ten most dangerous children’s toys. Here is 2020’s “10 Worst Toys” according to this year’s W.A.T.C.H report and the reason why they consider the toy to be unsafe:

 

  1. “Calico Critters Nursery Friends” manufactured by Epoch Co., LTD

Reason: “Potential for Choking Injuries”

 

2. “Missile Launcher” by Toysmith

Reason: “Potential for Eye and Facial Injuries”

 

3. “Marvel Avengers Vibranium Power FX Claw” by Hasbro

Reason: “Potential for Eye and Facial Injuries”

 

4. “Gloria Owl” by Jellycat Ltd.

Reason: “Potential for Ingestion/Aspiration Injuries”

 

5. “WWE Jumbo Superstar Fists” by Jakks Pacific, Inc.

Reason: “Potential for Blunt Force and Impact Injuries”

 

6. “Scientific Explorer Sci-Fi Slime” by Alex Brands

Reason: “Potential for Chemical Related Injuries”

 

7. “The Original Boomerang Interactive Stunt UFO” by Amax Group

Reason: “Potential for Cutting and Propeller-Related Injuries”

 

8. “Boom City Racers Starter Pack” by Moose Toys, LLC

Reason: “Potential for Eye and Facial Injuries”

 

9. “My Sweet Love: Lots to Love Babies, Minis” by JC Toys Group, Inc.

Reason: “Potential for Ingestion and Choking Injuries”

 

10. “Star Wars: Mandalorian Darksaber” by Hasbro

Reason: “Potential for Blunt Force and Eye Injuries”

 

Note that the Lento Law Group does not specifically endorse W.A.T.C.H.’s findings with respect to these toys; rather, we are merely sharing their independent findings for your consideration as it is important to know which toys your child may receive this holiday season that may be potentially harmful. Ensuring your children’s toys are safe and not subject to a product recall is particularly important, as W.A.T.C.H. warns in its report, “One child is treated in U.S. emergency rooms every three minutes for a toy-related injury”. 

 

Clearly, defective, counterfeit, or dangerous toys are the cause of thousands of injuries every year in the U.S., and product liability law provides the legal framework to hold manufacturers responsible for defective or dangerous toys.

 

As there is no federal product liability law, these types of product liability claims are typically based on state law and brought under theories of negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty. Additionally, commercial statutes in each state, often modeled on the Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”), can contain warranty rules which may affect litigant’s rights with respect to product liability.

 

Types of Product Defects

 

In a products liability case, the plaintiff bears the burden of proof to establish that the injury-causing product was defective, and that the defect was such that the product was unreasonably dangerous as a result. Generally, there are three types of defects that might cause injury and potentially give rise to liability on the part of the manufacturer or the supplier:

 

Design Defects – These are defects present in a product from its inception, even before it is manufactured, in that something in the design of the product is inherently unsafe.

 

Manufacturing Defects – These defects occur during the course of a product's manufacture or assembly, often because the manufacture has deviated from the product’s design in some way, often unknowingly or unintentionally.

 

Marketing Defects – These defects are inadequacies, inaccuracies, or omissions in the way a product is marketed, such as improper labeling, insufficient instructions, or inadequate safety warnings.

 

Who is Responsible for Toy-Related Injuries?

 

A legal doctrine known as "res ipsa loquitur" – in Latin, meaning, “the thing speaks for itself,” shifts the burden of proof in unique negligence cases where a mechanism of injury was so unusual that the mere virtue of its occurrence is indicative of someone else’s negligence. Put another way, the injury would not have ordinarily occurred in the absence of the defendant’s negligence, provided the mechanism of injury was in the defendant’s exclusive control and that the actions of the person injured did not cause or contribute to the injury occurring. 

 

The doctrine can be very helpful in products liability cases, because if it is successfully invoked, the plaintiff is no longer required to prove how the defendant was negligent; rather, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove that it was not negligent.

 

Another legal doctrine helpful to plaintiffs in product liability cases is that of strict liability, for if strict liability applies, the plaintiff does not need to prove that a manufacturer was negligent, but only that the product in question was defective. By eliminating from debate the issue of manufacturer fault, the concept of no-fault, or "strict" liability may allow a plaintiff to successfully recover in a case that could otherwise be difficult to prove.

 

If Your Child is Injured This Christmas

 

Try as we may, no one can prevent all accidents. Even the most diligent parent can inadvertently buy an unsafe toy for their, or someone else’s children. Often, product liability actions are very complex, and establishing legal fault can require the expertise of experienced professionals such as mechanical engineers to offer their opinions on the design of an arguably unsafe product. Additionally, as products liability is largely predicated upon state law which may differ from state-to-state, it is critical if you child is injured by a toy this holiday, that you contact a knowledgeable attorney to evaluate your claim. At Lento Law Group, we are committed to helping those who have sustained injuries through the carelessness of others, especially children.

 

If your child has suffered an injury this holiday caused by a potentially defective toy, call the Lento Law Group today! We will be happy to answer your questions and help you and your child get the recovery you deserve. As always, stay safe, and have a very Happy Holiday!

More News & Resources

January 17, 2026
WASHINGTON (AP) — Before President Donald Trump’s administration started dismantling the Education Department, the agency served as a powerful enforcer in cases of sexual violence at schools and universities. It brought the weight of the government against schools that mishandled sexual assault complaints involving students. That work is quickly fading away. The department’s Office for Civil Rights was gutted in Trump’s mass layoffs last year, leaving half as many lawyers to investigate complaints of discrimination based on race, sex or disability in schools. Those who remain face a backlog of more than 25,000 cases. Investigations have dwindled. Before the layoffs last March, the office opened dozens of sexual violence investigations a year. Since then, it’s opened fewer than 10 nationwide, according to internal data obtained by The Associated Press. Yet Trump’s Republican administration has doubled down on sexual discrimination cases of another kind. Trump officials have used Title IX, a 1972 gender equality law, against schools that make accommodations for transgender students and athletes. The Office for Civil Rights has opened nearly 50 such investigations since Trump took office a year ago. Even before the layoffs, critics said the office was understaffed and moved too slowly. Now, many firms that handle Title IX cases have stopped filing complaints, calling it a dead end. “It almost feels like you’re up against the void,” said Katie McKay, a lawyer at the New York firm C.A. Goldberg. “It feels like a big question mark right now,” she said. “How are we supposed to hold a school accountable once it has messed up?” An Education Department spokesperson said the office is working through its caseload, blaming President Joe Biden’s Democratic administration for leaving a backlog and rewriting Title IX rules to protect LGBTQ+ students. Trump officials rolled back those rules. “The Trump Administration has restored commonsense safeguards against sexual violence by returning sex-based separation in intimate facilities,” spokesperson Julie Hartman said. “OCR is and will continue to safeguard the dignity and safety of our nation’s students.” Students have few other places to turn The layoffs have slowed work at the Office for Civil Rights across the board, but it has an outsize impact on cases of sexual violence. Students who are mistreated by their schools — including victims and accused students alike — have few other venues to pursue justice. Many are now left with two options: File a lawsuit or walk away. One woman said she’s losing hope for a complaint she filed in 2024. She alleges her graduate school failed to follow its own policies when it suspended but didn’t expel another student found by the school to have sexually assaulted her. No one has contacted her about the complaint since 2024. The woman recently sued her school as a last resort. She said it feels like a David and Goliath mismatch. “They have all the power, because there is no large organization holding them accountable. It’s just me, just this one individual who’s filing this simple suit,” the woman said. The AP does not typically identify people who say they are victims of sexual assault unless they grant permission. The civil rights office is supposed to provide a free alternative to litigation. Anyone can file a complaint, which can trigger an investigation and sanctions for schools that violate federal law. In 2024, the agency received more than 1,000 complaints involving sexual violence or sexual harassment, according to an annual report. It’s unclear how many complaints have been filed more recently. Trump’s administration has not reported newer figures. In conversations with the AP, some staffers said cases are piling up so quickly they can’t track how many involve sexual violence. In December, the department acknowledged the civil rights backlog and announced dozens of downsized workers would be brought back to the office amid a legal challenge to their layoffs. The workers’ return offers some hope to those with pending civil rights complaints. Department officials have vowed to keep pushing for the layoffs. Historically, the feds have held schools and colleges accountable Before Trump was elected to his second term, the office had more than 300 pending investigations involving sexual assault, according to a public database. Most of those cases are believed to be sitting idle as investigators prioritize easier complaints, according to staffers who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. The details of past cases underscore the urgency of the work. In 2024, the office took action against a Pennsylvania school system after a girl with a disability told staff she had been sexually touched by a bus driver. She was put back on that driver’s bus later that afternoon, plus the next two days. The district was required to designate a Title IX coordinator for its schools, review previous complaints and consider compensation for the girl’s family. That year, the office demanded changes at a Montana school where a boy was pinned down by other students and assaulted after a wrestling practice. The students had been suspended for three days after school officials treated it as a case of hazing instead of sexual assault. In another case, the office sided with a University of Notre Dame student who had been expelled over accusations of sexual misconduct. The student said the college never told him precisely what he was accused of and refused to interview witnesses he put forward. Cases that get attention from the federal office are being handled under federal rules created during Trump’s first term. Those rules were designed to bolster the rights of students accused of sexual misconduct. Lawyers who work with accused students see little improvement. Justin Dillon, a Washington lawyer, said some of his recent complaints have been opened for investigation. He tells clients not to hold their breath. Even before the layoffs, cases could drag on for years, he said. Others gave up on the office years ago. The LLF National Law Firm said it stopped filing complaints in 2021 in favor of suing schools directly. Lawyers at the firm said the office had become incapable of delivering timely outcomes, which was only worsened by the layoffs. Complaints can be resolved several ways. They can be dismissed if they don’t pass legal muster. Many go to mediation, akin to a settlement. Some end in voluntary agreements from schools, with plans to rectify past wrongs and prevent future ones. In 2024, under Biden, the office secured 23 voluntary agreements from schools and colleges in cases involving sexual violence, according to a public database. In 2018, during Trump’s first term, there were 58. Since Trump took office again last year, there have been none. The dismantling of the Office for Civil Rights comes as a blow to Laura Dunn, a civil rights lawyer who was influential in getting President Barack Obama’s Democratic administration to make campus sexual assault a priority. As the issue gained public attention, the office started fielding hundreds of complaints a year. “All the progress survivors have made by sharing their story is being lost,” said Dunn, who’s now a Democratic candidate for Congress in New York. “We are literally losing civil rights progress in the United States, and it’s pushing us back more than 50 years.” ___ The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
By By: Joseph D. Lento September 8, 2025 September 12, 2025
Artificial intelligence continues to make big changes on school campuses at all levels nationwide. Students have already learned how helpful AI tools can be for studies. Yet students have also experienced a frightening wave of school academic misconduct charges alleging misuse of those AI tools. LLG National Law Group’s premier attorneys have rallied to the defense of students accused of AI misuse, defending and defeating school misconduct charges for students at all levels nationwide. But the latest wave of AI chatbot tools threatens to once again transform the school misconduct landscape. Call 833.536.8652 now to retain the LLG National Law Group’s highly qualified attorneys if you face artificial intelligence issues with your school. Student Use of AI Tools in School To this point, students have used ChatGPT and other general artificial intelligence tools, and similar tools designed more specifically for education, to aid their studies. Students have used general AI tools to propose paper topics, suggest paper organization, flag spelling and grammar errors, and suggest improvements in writing. Students have also used general AI tools to correct problem answers, explain subjects more thoroughly, and for similar traditional study purposes. These uses of AI have made studies more efficient and productive, speeding learning. Chat Bots as the Next Phase of School AI Tools Artificial intelligence chatbots, though, are further accelerating the pace of technological change in schools. Students are now able to use platforms like Schoolhub.ai to create their own individual AI-powered chatbot as a personal study assistant, tailored to their specific needs and school program. Getting ready for school once meant buying notebooks and pencils. It later meant buying a laptop computer or tablet. Today, preparing for school may mean creating and training your own chatbot as a personal study assistant. The Discipline Risk of Chat Bots Teachers, professors, departments, and schools have all been slow in developing and publishing policies on student use of AI tools. That delay led to a first wave of student academic misconduct charges for misusing readily available, greatly helpful, and widely used AI tools. Our attorneys have been busy turning back that first wave of AI misuse charges. The new AI-powered chatbots, though, don’t just write assigned papers or answer exam problems, as specifically prohibited by many school policies. The AI chatbots are instead active student study partners, more like a human tutor than a computer program or other digital tool. Schools need to quickly modify their AI policies to help students take due advantage of these powerful new learning tools, rather than to punish students for getting the help they need. Premier Student AI Misconduct Defense Available Retain the LLG National Law Group’s premier attorneys if you are a student facing AI misconduct charges in a school disciplinary proceeding. Our attorneys are ready to help you defend your AI chatbot use or other use of AI tools. We help hundreds of students nationwide defend and defeat student code of conduct charges of all kinds. Call 833.536.8652 now for the representation you need for your best possible student discipline outcome.
By By Joseph D. Lento, Esquire • 27 June, 2025 June 27, 2025
Harvard University’s regulatory issues with the current federal administration impact student rights and interests. Get our help.
By By Joseph D. Lento, Esquire • 26 June, 2025 June 27, 2025
The year 2025 brings more changes to the national Nurse Licensing Compact. Get our skilled attorney's help with license issues.
By David Haislip March 14, 2025
The expansion of nationwide licensure compacts impacts the ability of licensed professionals to gain and retain licenses. Get help.
By David Haislip December 5, 2024
By Terrell A. Ratliff, Esquire • 3 rd December, 2024
By David Haislip December 5, 2024
The Lento Law Group defends people accused of or charged with child abuse in Pennsylvania.
By David Haislip November 28, 2024
A 30-year-old woman in Oklahoma received a victim protection order (VPO) against her father after he beat her.
By David Haislip November 28, 2024
Bam Margera heads to rehab after a DUI arrest in Pennsylvania. Learn about DUI defense in Pennsylvania.
By David Haislip November 15, 2024
The House of Representatives has advanced an anti-hazing bill for Senate consideration that would increase hazing prevention.