5 Things to Avoid Before Filing Bankruptcy

David Haislip • April 21, 2021

Written by New Jersey Bankruptcy Lawyer, Lee M. Perlman.

I am sometimes asked by clients if there’s anything they should avoid doing before they file bankruptcy. More frequently, I learn during the first or second client meeting that one (or more!) of those things have already been done. If you’re even thinking about taking the plunge into a bankruptcy, there are several things you should avoid. So without further adieu, here are a few of the things NOT to do before you file a bankruptcy:

1. Transferring money or property to family or friends

A lot of people think that if they file a bankruptcy, they will have to surrender all of their assets – money, real estate, cars, etc. Based on that (incorrect) assumption, it seems logical that transferring or giving away your property or valuables before you file bankruptcy would put you in a better position and allow you to keep your stuff. However, both of these things are false. First, when you file for bankruptcy, you do not have to surrender everything you own; in fact, the bankruptcy laws are specifically designed to protect and let you keep your stuff (up to certain limits). Second, giving away your assets is a big fat no-no, and could even be considered bankruptcy fraud.

Curious about what exactly it means to “transfer property?” Here are some examples of what to avoid:

Removing your name from a joint financial account (and leaving the account in the name of someone who is not filing bankruptcy)
Removing yourself from title to a car
Removing your name from a business venture
Deeding real estate to someone else
Depositing or moving funds into a bank account that belongs to someone else

2. Raiding your 401K or pension before filing for bankruptcy

For many people, bankruptcy is a last resort that they try to avoid by getting money to pay their bills from any available source. Oftentimes this leads them to borrowing from a 401k or pension. Unfortunately, this usually doesn’t work long term, and in the end a bankruptcy has to be filed despite this well meant attempt. What people don’t realize is that many retirement plans, like 401ks and employer structured pensions, are protected from creditors when a bankruptcy is filed. So when I hear that clients have needlessly used or depleted retirement savings in a futile attempt to avoid bankruptcy, I am always so disappointed that I did not have the chance to tell them what not to do before they came to talk to me!

3. Lying about your assets or income

When you file for bankruptcy, you have a duty to be truthful in your petition (i.e., the papers that you file with the court). This includes accurately disclosing both what you own, and your level of income. If you fail to include everything you own, or attempt to lie about your income, your case could be dismissed – and if your case gets dismissed, you won't receive a bankruptcy discharge – and it’s the discharge that gives you the fresh start you were hoping for when you decided to file for bankruptcy in the first place. Even worse, hiding your assets or income could lead to a criminal case being brought against you, complete with U.S. Department of Justice and FBI investigations. The takeaway? Lying about assets is another giant no-no.

4. Running up your credit cards

For most people, the ultimate goal in a bankruptcy case is to receive a discharge of their debts. The discharge is the thing that officially gets rid of your debt and allows you to get the fresh start you were hoping for. But your creditors can object to you getting a discharge. You heard that right - that department store, Visa card issuer, dentist - they can all object to your discharge in certain circumstances. And running up your debt right before you file is one of those circumstances.

Using your credit cards for necessities like gas, food, housing or medicine prior to filing is usually permitted. But when you charge things that are considered luxuries and not necessary to your maintenance and support, you should be prepared for an objection by the creditor. If the creditor is successful with the objection, the debt that you owe to that creditor will not be discharged, and you will still owe that money even after you receive a discharge for your other debts.

5. Favoring one creditor over another

What does it mean to favor a creditor and how can this hurt your case? When you favor a creditor it means you decide to pay one creditor only, and don’t pay the others. And anyone that you owe money to is considered a creditor – you may not think of the parent that lent you money as a creditor, but the bankruptcy code does. Your mom may not be a big financial institution, and your Visa card issuer may not make you chicken soup when you’re sick, but in the context of your bankruptcy case, your mom and your Visa card share equal status as creditors.

Paying creditors as you ordinarily do is ok, but paying one creditor only, especially a family member or friend, is not allowed, and the court can order the creditor (even your mom) to return the money so that it can be distributed to all the creditors.

The five things listed above are my top five things to avoid before filing for bankruptcy – mostly because they’re the most common mistakes I see people make, and because they’re easy to avoid as long as you know about them. There may be other things to avoid (or things you should specifically not avoid) based on the circumstances of your particular case. You should talk to a bankruptcy attorney if you’re even thinking about filing for bankruptcy – before you’re ready to file – to see what you should and shouldn’t do now, to avoid problems in your case later.

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Mail

More News & Resources

The Education Department is opening fewer sexual violence investigations as Trump dismantles it

January 17, 2026

WASHINGTON (AP) — Before President Donald Trump’s administration started dismantling the Education Department, the agency served as a powerful enforcer in cases of sexual violence at schools and universities. It brought the weight of the government against schools that mishandled sexual assault complaints involving students. That work is quickly fading away. The department’s Office for Civil Rights was gutted in Trump’s mass layoffs last year, leaving half as many lawyers to investigate complaints of discrimination based on race, sex or disability in schools. Those who remain face a backlog of more than 25,000 cases. Investigations have dwindled. Before the layoffs last March, the office opened dozens of sexual violence investigations a year. Since then, it’s opened fewer than 10 nationwide, according to internal data obtained by The Associated Press. Yet Trump’s Republican administration has doubled down on sexual discrimination cases of another kind. Trump officials have used Title IX, a 1972 gender equality law, against schools that make accommodations for transgender students and athletes. The Office for Civil Rights has opened nearly 50 such investigations since Trump took office a year ago. Even before the layoffs, critics said the office was understaffed and moved too slowly. Now, many firms that handle Title IX cases have stopped filing complaints, calling it a dead end. “It almost feels like you’re up against the void,” said Katie McKay, a lawyer at the New York firm C.A. Goldberg. “It feels like a big question mark right now,” she said. “How are we supposed to hold a school accountable once it has messed up?” An Education Department spokesperson said the office is working through its caseload, blaming President Joe Biden’s Democratic administration for leaving a backlog and rewriting Title IX rules to protect LGBTQ+ students. Trump officials rolled back those rules. “The Trump Administration has restored commonsense safeguards against sexual violence by returning sex-based separation in intimate facilities,” spokesperson Julie Hartman said. “OCR is and will continue to safeguard the dignity and safety of our nation’s students.” Students have few other places to turn The layoffs have slowed work at the Office for Civil Rights across the board, but it has an outsize impact on cases of sexual violence. Students who are mistreated by their schools — including victims and accused students alike — have few other venues to pursue justice. Many are now left with two options: File a lawsuit or walk away. One woman said she’s losing hope for a complaint she filed in 2024. She alleges her graduate school failed to follow its own policies when it suspended but didn’t expel another student found by the school to have sexually assaulted her. No one has contacted her about the complaint since 2024. The woman recently sued her school as a last resort. She said it feels like a David and Goliath mismatch. “They have all the power, because there is no large organization holding them accountable. It’s just me, just this one individual who’s filing this simple suit,” the woman said. The AP does not typically identify people who say they are victims of sexual assault unless they grant permission. The civil rights office is supposed to provide a free alternative to litigation. Anyone can file a complaint, which can trigger an investigation and sanctions for schools that violate federal law. In 2024, the agency received more than 1,000 complaints involving sexual violence or sexual harassment, according to an annual report. It’s unclear how many complaints have been filed more recently. Trump’s administration has not reported newer figures. In conversations with the AP, some staffers said cases are piling up so quickly they can’t track how many involve sexual violence. In December, the department acknowledged the civil rights backlog and announced dozens of downsized workers would be brought back to the office amid a legal challenge to their layoffs. The workers’ return offers some hope to those with pending civil rights complaints. Department officials have vowed to keep pushing for the layoffs. Historically, the feds have held schools and colleges accountable Before Trump was elected to his second term, the office had more than 300 pending investigations involving sexual assault, according to a public database. Most of those cases are believed to be sitting idle as investigators prioritize easier complaints, according to staffers who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retribution. The details of past cases underscore the urgency of the work. In 2024, the office took action against a Pennsylvania school system after a girl with a disability told staff she had been sexually touched by a bus driver. She was put back on that driver’s bus later that afternoon, plus the next two days. The district was required to designate a Title IX coordinator for its schools, review previous complaints and consider compensation for the girl’s family. That year, the office demanded changes at a Montana school where a boy was pinned down by other students and assaulted after a wrestling practice. The students had been suspended for three days after school officials treated it as a case of hazing instead of sexual assault. In another case, the office sided with a University of Notre Dame student who had been expelled over accusations of sexual misconduct. The student said the college never told him precisely what he was accused of and refused to interview witnesses he put forward. Cases that get attention from the federal office are being handled under federal rules created during Trump’s first term. Those rules were designed to bolster the rights of students accused of sexual misconduct. Lawyers who work with accused students see little improvement. Justin Dillon, a Washington lawyer, said some of his recent complaints have been opened for investigation. He tells clients not to hold their breath. Even before the layoffs, cases could drag on for years, he said. Others gave up on the office years ago. The LLF National Law Firm said it stopped filing complaints in 2021 in favor of suing schools directly. Lawyers at the firm said the office had become incapable of delivering timely outcomes, which was only worsened by the layoffs. Complaints can be resolved several ways. They can be dismissed if they don’t pass legal muster. Many go to mediation, akin to a settlement. Some end in voluntary agreements from schools, with plans to rectify past wrongs and prevent future ones. In 2024, under Biden, the office secured 23 voluntary agreements from schools and colleges in cases involving sexual violence, according to a public database. In 2018, during Trump’s first term, there were 58. Since Trump took office again last year, there have been none. The dismantling of the Office for Civil Rights comes as a blow to Laura Dunn, a civil rights lawyer who was influential in getting President Barack Obama’s Democratic administration to make campus sexual assault a priority. As the issue gained public attention, the office started fielding hundreds of complaints a year. “All the progress survivors have made by sharing their story is being lost,” said Dunn, who’s now a Democratic candidate for Congress in New York. “We are literally losing civil rights progress in the United States, and it’s pushing us back more than 50 years.” ___ The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

What the Next Artificial Intelligence Phase Means for School Discipline

By By: Joseph D. Lento September 8, 2025 • September 12, 2025

Artificial intelligence continues to make big changes on school campuses at all levels nationwide. Students have already learned how helpful AI tools can be for studies. Yet students have also experienced a frightening wave of school academic misconduct charges alleging misuse of those AI tools. LLG National Law Group’s premier attorneys have rallied to the defense of students accused of AI misuse, defending and defeating school misconduct charges for students at all levels nationwide. But the latest wave of AI chatbot tools threatens to once again transform the school misconduct landscape. Call 833.536.8652 now to retain the LLG National Law Group’s highly qualified attorneys if you face artificial intelligence issues with your school. Student Use of AI Tools in School To this point, students have used ChatGPT and other general artificial intelligence tools, and similar tools designed more specifically for education, to aid their studies. Students have used general AI tools to propose paper topics, suggest paper organization, flag spelling and grammar errors, and suggest improvements in writing. Students have also used general AI tools to correct problem answers, explain subjects more thoroughly, and for similar traditional study purposes. These uses of AI have made studies more efficient and productive, speeding learning. Chat Bots as the Next Phase of School AI Tools Artificial intelligence chatbots, though, are further accelerating the pace of technological change in schools. Students are now able to use platforms like Schoolhub.ai to create their own individual AI-powered chatbot as a personal study assistant, tailored to their specific needs and school program. Getting ready for school once meant buying notebooks and pencils. It later meant buying a laptop computer or tablet. Today, preparing for school may mean creating and training your own chatbot as a personal study assistant. The Discipline Risk of Chat Bots Teachers, professors, departments, and schools have all been slow in developing and publishing policies on student use of AI tools. That delay led to a first wave of student academic misconduct charges for misusing readily available, greatly helpful, and widely used AI tools. Our attorneys have been busy turning back that first wave of AI misuse charges. The new AI-powered chatbots, though, don’t just write assigned papers or answer exam problems, as specifically prohibited by many school policies. The AI chatbots are instead active student study partners, more like a human tutor than a computer program or other digital tool. Schools need to quickly modify their AI policies to help students take due advantage of these powerful new learning tools, rather than to punish students for getting the help they need. Premier Student AI Misconduct Defense Available Retain the LLG National Law Group’s premier attorneys if you are a student facing AI misconduct charges in a school disciplinary proceeding. Our attorneys are ready to help you defend your AI chatbot use or other use of AI tools. We help hundreds of students nationwide defend and defeat student code of conduct charges of all kinds. Call 833.536.8652 now for the representation you need for your best possible student discipline outcome.